HomeAI

Curiosity killed the cat, but made the IT director (and will superpower AI)

Like Tweet Pin it Share Share Email

Those of us who grow into Leadership in IT do so primarily powered by one driving factor—our curiosity.  Curious nerd-dom  has been a dominant theme in this community.  You wouldn’t be reading this column if you hadn’t been interested in how you could take technology and use it to solve some sort of business problem.

Aw, no, sorry. If we’re going to be honest with each other … and I can trust you with a secret, can’t I? … you were less interested in how technology could solve business problems than you were interested in a seriously cool innovation of some kind.

Because it was seriously cool, you wanted an excuse to play with it. That excuse was that it could solve some business problems. You needed the excuse because our business counterparts frowned upon us IT nerds just wanting to have fun.

And just as you saw the potential in a cool technology and explained it with enthusiasm, your colleagues saw the potential in you. Or likely, lots of other people saw this in you, as you worked to address some challenges that somebody mentioned to you or that you saw in your own. You probably had some sort of “Eureka” moment that you remember clearly about how you made some sort of new magic happen, and it was driven in part by your curiosity.

Don’t be shy – share your experience of this in the Comments.

Recognizing the power of curiosity, you may have used this as a criteria in how you have grown and managed people in their careers as well—I believe that in every organization, we are looking for others that can solve a problem innovatively.  We see people with these strengths as worthy of our trust, and we are more likely to wish to work with them, mentor them, and see them flourish and grow.

There are countless bitchy columns complaining about Millennials and Gen Z workers, and their poor work ethics.  This flannel wearing, grunge listening, Gen X columnist rejects these ideas as utter nonsense, having heard the same disparagements aimed at my cohort.    But, I do have a warning and plea—We need to continue to encourage curiosity, on the clock, and off, for our staff to grow and thrive.

Since we are starting to figure out what AI will do to our profession,  let’s point out that AI is insatiably curious.  It doesn’t care about politics, Tik Tok trends, cat videos or anime movies( or at least, it has the same unlimited curiosity for each of these topics.)   It is always interested in studying what others have posted on GitHub, or any other place that there is new content.  AI doesn’t sleep, and doesn’t want to take PTO.

The results of this—New hiring for developers (and others) has slowed  to a crawl.  In talking with others, new engineers, PMs and others at the entry level are having a hard time getting hired, regardless of the specialty.

What is to be done?

Well, I for one, welcome our new AI overlords.

But, on top of that, I would ask all of us to coach, mentor and encourage our staff to not get distracted, always be learning, and find our super powers of curiosity.  A few nights and weekends of growth and self directed learning turn out to be the key to many of our careers. And we need to help others find this answer as well, so that they can continue to build meaningful careers.

Comments (8)

  • I think we are a tad early to declare AI a success. The death of the developer has been predicted for a long time and ultimately wrong each time. We are seeing an unbelievable amount of capital being pushed into a very new technology. It has yet to prove it will ultimately be profitable or productive. Many executives pushed all of their chips in and will continue until the bottom line starts to matter again. This won’t be the first bubble to burst but may be one of the biggest.

    • Author

      You are not wrong on the bubble aspects of AI. There is plenty of evidence of that situation being real. Nevertheless, young, talented CompSci grads are having a serious problem getting hired right now. I don’t think the two situations are unrelated.
      Dave, your opinions are always insightful, and I am glad to hear from you.

  • I don’t see evidence that AI exercises curiousity or empathy just new variations on the old of pattern matching and evaluating variations faster than humans might be able. I hired Product Managers for those two qualities curiousity or empathy knowing we could teach almost everything else if they had those qualities and the desire to make great products in partnership with our engineers. AI is a useful tool but just a tool and an untrustworthy one for now in many use cases.

    • Author

      Your point about empathy hits the nail on the head– Any good product manager needs to know what their users are feeling, not just doing. I agree that AI isn’t delivering on that front– at all.
      In so many cases I can think of, great product managers were former users who came over to the development side out of frustration.

  • Yes! Yes! Yes! A million times yes! To curiosity, to poking and prodding to see what’s inside / how it works / how it’s made / etc.

    I’m with Sam on the AI point — it may be regurgitating GitHub pages a mile a minute, but curious it ain’t. Many times it can pretend convincingly though, like a psychopath.

  • Not I.T., but a senior academic in Australia talking about their personal use of AI and saving significant time (12hrs/week ) in multiple areas – admin/ email, collaboration, writing & blogging. Presumably a ‘Leader’ as well (has a team).

    I see I.T. and academics are both prototypical ‘Knowledge Workers’, both requiring creativity, deep knowledge (somewhere) and ‘attention to detail’.

    ==============

    Why you need a No-bot

    ==============

    My favourite ChatGPT (ChattieG!) writing prompts

    ==============

    Academic Cyborgs and Bullshit Reading

    ==============

  • “…another toy that helped destroy the elder race of man…”
    Sorry, I just had a Rush of 2112.

    AI, like any other tool, has much potential. Good and bad.
    It’s worth remembering it is programmed by humans, who are entirely fallible despite of best intentions.

    Will it prove to be a plus or a minus for humanity?
    Is social media a plus or a minus?

Comments are closed.