All mothers belong to the same religion and ethnic group.

I say this because no matter whom I’m kidding with, guilt is a particular specialty of their religion or ethnic group and mothers are the designated delivery system.

“You think your mother made you feel guilty?” they might say. “Let me tell you about my mother. Now there’s a woman who could make you feel guilty!”

Jewish, Lutheran, Irish, African … it doesn’t matter. The light bulb joke punch line works no matter which group you insert (“None … I’ll just sit here in the dark and I’ll be fine!”). And yes, Mom stood up with the best of ’em, and I’d give anything for one more dose of guilt from her.

We’re continuing our discussion of the five great marketing motivators — fear, greed, guilt, need for approval, and exclusivity — and how you can use them to motivate your staff. Fear, we found, can be very useful and effective, but only in a narrow range of circumstances.

Greed also has its uses. Its range is similarly narrow — money is a better communicator than motivator. Putting your money where your mouth is adds credibility to your message. Using it as an incentive is risky (check out last week’s column for the specifics). A final thought about using financial incentives: Employees know you’re basically giving them a bribe to perform. A dangerous message.

Guilt is a favorite maternal motivator, and I don’t want to sell it short. As a way of teaching morality to children, it has few peers.

As an employee motivator, though, it stinks. Adults have a fairly uniform response to induced guilt: They become resentful. Don’t use it.

So how about the need for approval? It’s one of the most powerful tools you have. Here’s how to do it right:

  • Praise publicly. Let the team know when someone does something praiseworthy. That magnifies the good feeling and helps build the team.
  • Be specific: Focus on the one or two best aspects of the employee’s performance. For example, if the result was merely adequate but the employee overcame significant obstacles, praise the overcoming. Vague generalizations set off BS (bushwah) detectors. Specificity demonstrates sincerity, and insincere praise is poison.
  • Grade hard: If you’re an “easy grader” your praise becomes meaningless. If you’re excessively demanding, though, employees will give up. That’s one reason to be specific: You can praise an aspect of the work without praising everything about it.
  • Spread it around: For team efforts, take the time to focus on the best part of each team member’s contribution. Don’t turn it into an Oscar acceptance speech: When a big team succeeds, emphasize it being a team effort, and emphasize a few key individuals.
  • Critique in private: It’s perfectly valid to praise someone’s performance publicly and hold a private debriefing where you reinforce what was done well and still analyze how he or she can improve further.
  • Don’t play favorites: No, not everyone has to get “their turn” … but be very careful. When everyone else gets a pat on the back but me, I’ll start feeling resentful. If you have an employee who never deserves public praise, you should be doing a lot of coaching on how to improve. Silence, in this case, is awful.

An earlier column established leadership as a matter of who looks to whom for approval. (See “Becoming a good leader might mean teaching an old dog new tricks,” InfoWorld, Nov. 11, 1996, page 72). Praising employees has a fringe benefit beyond motivation: It gives employees the mental habit of looking to you for praise — it establishes your leadership.

Praising peers isn’t a bad idea either, and for exactly the same reasons.

I love hearing managers complain about unions.

“You can’t get those guys to take responsibility,” they complain. “They’re just not motivated. Don’t blame me — they belong to a union!”

Union members who won’t take responsibility? Didn’t I just hear the manager refuse to take responsibility for motivating employees? It would be one thing if motivating union members were impossible, but it isn’t. I’ve seen it done, and in small ways I’ve done it myself once or twice.

Employee motivation is one of your most critical responsibilities as a manager. Last week we talked about the five great motivators, learned from my personal marketing guru (aka Dad): fear, greed, guilt, need for approval, and exclusivity. We explored fear and its limitations. A last thought: Don’t confuse fear and intimidation. There’s never an excuse for bullying an employee. Bullying is simple self-indulgence.

How about greed? Managers misunderstand and abuse greed more than any other motivational technique. Managers who don’t understand how to motivate union members share a mentality with those who rely excessively on the compensation system as a motivator — they think employees do it for the money.

Outside of sales, greed has big problems as a general-purpose motivational tool. You can apply it in four ways: salary, spot bonuses, annual incentives, and stock ownership. Salary is the worst. Let’s take an employee who earns $50,000 annually and try to use his salary increase as a performance incentive. Let’s imagine your company has established 4 percent as its standard raise for average employees. You squeak out a 7 percent raise for a great performer — way above the average. Wow! After taxes, your great performer will take home less than $20 a week more than an average one. If you think that will motivate someone to excel next year, you’re living in a fantasy world.

How about spot bonuses? They’re very nice to receive. You see an employee who does killer work, so you give her a spot bonus of a few thousand dollars, for which she’s thrilled. “That ought to motivate everyone,” you think to yourself.

How so? Every other employee is thinking, “When is it my turn?” And the employee who received the bonus? She’ll continue to work hard, but if she doesn’t get another spot bonus she’ll become grumpy too. Add it all up and you lose more than you win.

Annual incentive programs and employee stock ownership programs, or ESOPs? When structured properly, these are pretty good ideas. They work well because they deliver enough money to be meaningful. They work well because they give employees a stake in the company’s success. And they work well because they mitigate the enervating sense that bonuses are a management perk. (Management perks deliver a simple message: “Managers are better than you are.”)

Most of all, though, annual incentives and ESOPs work because they’re great communication tools. The money isn’t as important as the message, and the message says, “We really mean it when we tell you about the kind of behavior and results we value. You know we mean it because we’re putting our money where our mouths are.”

If you think of money as a communications vehicle you’ll stay on track with spot bonuses and salary increases, too. Present the salary increase as your understanding of the employee’s quality. Deliver a spot bonus privately, and say, “We don’t give out a lot of these. You’ve done a lot to earn it, and your work on the new payroll system is just the most recent example. This is just our small way of saying we appreciate the great work. Thanks.”

Delivering money unfairly demotivates employees as much as anything you can do. Using it to motivate is risky.

But used properly, it’s a great communication tool. After all, money talks.