“Refactoring” brings out my inner skeptic. I’ve heard too many Agile enthusiasts who sound like they code at Hogwarts, waving their wands while yelling refactorum! at badly written but functional code so it magically realigns itself into a form that adheres to good programming standards.

People Who Know Such Things tell me I’m not being entirely fair, as if being entirely fair is something People Who Publish Blogs are supposed to aspire to. At times, they say, getting code to do what it’s supposed to do first, and then rewriting it into a better form can make more sense than trying to write it both right and well at the same time.

The session was titled End User Computing. I thought it was a grammatical error … I expected it to be about end-user computing, not about how to end … as in prevent … user computing.

And to be fair, the panelists didn’t advocate ending it. One, a credentialed authority on security, pointed out … somewhat grudgingly, but she did point out … that the lockdown era is over. Given the proliferation of end-user devices and the increase in travelers, teleworkers, contract labor and so on, locking down every access point is no longer practical.

In its place is a better approach, which emphasizes protection of information assets rather than making hardening all access points the centerpiece.

The other panelist lead a team within IT responsible for developing apps and such for the company’s customers and employees use on their personal smartphones and tablets. His focus was creating innovative products for end-user computing devices.

And then they were done.