To optimize the whole you usually have to sub-optimize the parts. This is a fundamental reality of design. It isn’t, however, an original discovery. I personally first encountered the concept...…
...don’t mind “sub-optimize the parts to optimize the whole” at all. It is catchy. More important, the phrasing requires executives and managers to figure out what constitutes the “whole” and...…
...popular strawman is that Agile can’t work because in order to optimize the whole you have to suboptimize the parts, which supposedly can’t happen because in Agile, each developer does...…
...to explore in depth. Top-down planning has the advantage over bottom-up initiative when it comes to engineering elegance. Since the only way to optimize the whole is to sub-optimize the...…
...is likely to have changed, in numerous, subtle, hard-to define ways. You have to suboptimize the parts to optimize the whole. Most outsourcing arrangements violate this premise, and they do...…
...end-user support has to be sub-optimized, recognizing that an additional delay in resolving some complaint or other is outweighed by (for example) the need to allow key developers to focus...…
...means.) It’s time to wrap up our discussion of organizational optimization. It began with a proposition from the KJR Manifesto: That to optimize the whole you have to sub-optimize the...…
...we did. We didn’t optimize processes, orchestrate them, or develop metrics to assess their performance. We obliterated them, replacing them with computer programs that called on humans only when an...…
...practices that fit best. Different situations call for different solutions — form follows function. 1. To optimize the whole you must sub-optimize the parts. Being clear about where your company...…
ManagementSpeak: In order to optimize the whole we’ll have to sub-optimize the parts. Translation: Your whole is about to be optimized. Alternative Translation: We’re going to ruin the parts. Thanks...…