What are your core values?

I found myself explaining my core values to a man who will have more of an opportunity to raise my children than I will myself — my ex-wife’s new husband, who lives in another city, with whom my children will live.

He had the grace to ask how I want my kids raised. In response, I explained my core values — not the universals we all automatically share, but the ones we might not, even though we both have “good values”.

Here’s one: The universe is a big complicated place. We don’t understand far more than we do. Despite our insurmountable ignorance, there are those who declare their beliefs are the one true faith. They may tolerate others, but toleration is less than the respect given equals.

Our religious documents — the Bible, Koran, Bhaghavat Gita and all the rest — were written by people. They were inspired, perhaps, but they were people nonetheless, with all the normal human constraints imposed by culture, language, and intellect. They filtered their inspiration through those constraints. Neither they, nor you nor I know the one true religion.

Not all mores are acceptable (the cult of Thuggee, for example, which practices ritual assassination, is out of bounds), but there are many different fully valid ways to live. Toleration, which assumes superiority, is a poor attitude. It’s important to embrace all of the many good ways to live a life, and be grateful we live in a world where people have the imagination to find them.

Another core value: Dietrich Bonhoeffer once said, “Comfort the troubled; trouble the comfortable.” Chico Marx said it even better in A Night at the Opera: “Now we really get to work!” The Marx Brothers epitomized our heritage of cheerful disrespect for authority.

The good victims aren’t picked by others. Let someone else make you angry and you’ve been manipulated. The Marx Brothers were immune to propagandists — they chose their own antagonists, always the smug, the arrogant, the self-righteous, the pompous, and most of all the powerful. By puncturing them, they comforted the troubled, too.

So choose your own targets, kids, choose them well, and make sure they’re your targets and not someone else’s. Then take careful aim, remember how I taught you to throw — with vigor and accuracy — and let the pies fly.

And remember that some traditions are worth preserving, so use whipped cream, not Cool Whip.

But the value that is at my core is this: I like hurricanes, tornadoes, earthquakes and volcanoes. Despite the tragedies they engender, they remind us we live in a world beyond our mastery.

The day we tame nature, turning the earth into a gigantic Disney theme park, will be the saddest day in human history. We have a deep need to be exceeded by forces we barely understand and can’t hope to control. We need a world with wildness in it to give us a sense of place and perspective. This, it occurs to me, underlies the rest: There’s a virtue in wildness that exceeds the virtue of anything we are able to control. Wildness shows us the limitations of our personal perspectives, and casts doubt on all of our certainties.

This holiday season, as I write these words, I’m looking through a window onto a peaceful lake in the woods, with snow falling gently onto pine trees. It’s really quite beautiful. I hope you also have the chance to experience peaceful beauty this holiday season.

But more, I hope you cherish the wild.

We need more women in IT.

Now that I’m skating on thin ice, let me explain. When I was a lad, women’s fashions were a big deal. If the designers declared hem lengths were up, most women wore short skirts, acting as if the fashion police would pay a visit.

I still see articles about fashion trends in the paper, but women respond differently now, mostly dressing as they like. We need more women in IT, because while women have learned to ignore fashion trends, I’m not so sure IT has. For example, I just read that while MSPs are becoming a popular strategy, alternatives are cropping up.

MSP, in case you haven’t encountered the term, stands for “Management Service Provider”. It’s a company that will monitor your systems and network for you, fixing problems or at least alerting you to them.

I first ran across the term no more than three months ago. Assume most IT shops ran across it around the same time, from a sales representative sitting in front of the CIO. I doubt many CIOs stood right up and said, “Great idea! I want one, and I want to buy it from you.”

I figure, right about now the early adopters are plowing through responses to their MSP RFPs while they search their souls, making sure they really want to go through with this.

Yet according to someone in the trade press, undoubtedly quoting some analyst or other from one of the research services, MSPs are becoming a popular strategy, yet alternatives are cropping up.

ASPs preceded MSPs in the trend-mill. The original application service providers could only have appealed to small startups. Yet like a weather balloon, with very little mass but a big cross-section, ASPs were huge blobs on the IT radar screen. Most CIOs I talk to on the subject snort, pointing out that (1) IT has been integrated into the heart of their companies’ processes and culture; (2) their systems are heavily customized for their particular situations; (3) increasingly, they’re depending on tight integration of their systems to accomplish their companies’ business strategies; and (4) what happens if the ASP … generally a venture-backed startup with negative earnings … goes away?

(This last one is a big issue: One CEO recounted an 11-week SAP implementation — the result of Pandesic’s undignified withdrawal from the fray. You’d think that between them Intel and SAP could have managed to keep Pandesic running long enough to protect their customers, wouldn’t you?)

It isn’t just ASPs and MSPs either. Thin clients (which really are fat networks, as has been pointed out in this space many times) preceded them as a trend declared in advance of market acceptance. In fact, pundits now proclaim us to be in the post-PC era despite the PC’s near ubiquity on the desktop and growing … not shrinking … penetration of the home market.

This is the current trend in trends: It’s a trend when a market analyst, desperate to be the first to spot the Next Big Thing, declares it to be a trend, not when the market follows along. Market analysts have become prescriptive rather than descriptive — a dangerous practice that pollutes the discipline, putting them on a par with fashion designers. But women have learned to ignore the designers and wear what’s comfortable and looks good on them.

We need more women in IT.